• OpenAI
  • OpenText
  • OpenVMS
  • OpenServer
  • OpenEdge
  • OpenDrive
  • etc.
  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of these names (like OpenVMS) are from before the term “open source software” was coined (which was in 1998). They refer instead to “open systems”, meaning computer systems with published specifications, interoperable hardware, portable software, etc. – things that might seem like obvious choices now, but were not in early business computing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(computing)

    • Devgard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure Anytype is finally open sourcing their code after years of it being in alpha though?

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Source is available to the public under their own custom licence, but you cannot use it commercially. Server side is closed. So you just know there is no malware inside and you can propose a bugfix, that’s not enough to be open source, yet they misleading call it that.

          • MHLoppy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You seem to be using the term “open source” for what is instead commonly called “source-available”, which has a distinct meaning from open source.

            [Source-available software] includes arrangements where the source can be viewed, and in some cases modified, but without necessarily meeting the criteria to be called open-source.

            [Open-source software] is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose.

            edit: fixed duplicated phrasing

            • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I am using the term for how it was originally used, back in the free software movement days in the 70s and 80s.

              Open source means nothing more than the source beeing open for all to see. What your are describing we called Free Software or later FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) but the open source part is redundant in that acronym.

              Also some started using Libre instead of Free, as Free sometimes are confused with Gratis. That is where the expression Free as in Freedom cones from.

              • MHLoppy@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fair enough. I suppose the terminology has evolved somewhat with time, and I can’t say I have much insight into a time period from before I was born.