Meta given 30 days to cease using the name Threads by company that trademarked it 11 years ago::undefined

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know which concerns me more: That Meta gets their asses kicked, or why the f-ck someone was able to trademark the word “Threads”.

    • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      You don’t trademark the word “threads”, you trademark it within the context of the industry you’re in

      I can make a shop that sells pies and call it “Apple”

    • the_ocs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 months ago

      Someone was able to trademark the word “Apple”, so that’s not so surprising

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        8 months ago

        Twice.

        And when Apple violated the agreement they made with Apple Music not to enter each other’s industries (Apple Records couldn’t sell tech and Apple Computers couldn’t sell music), they successfully argued in court that iTunes wasn’t selling music, but digital downloads…

          • Gray@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I always thought it was funny while studying for my Cisco certification that their operating system was also called IOS. I had no idea there was actual drama behind it!

      • Treczoks@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which, for me, also falls under “why the heck was this legal at any time?”

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Because unless you want every company to be a random Amazon brand or initialism, that’s how it kinda has to be, and it works fine until one company gains so much market share the word starts being associated with only them.
          Think of like, Target or Shell. Both are huge companies, but their fields are narrow. You might confuse a Target named restaurant or pharmacy to be the Target, but probably not much more. And if it doesn’t have anything to do with oil or gas, it’s almost certainly not that Shell.

          Apple is just so huge I wouldn’t be surprised if at this point people think of iPhones while buying lunch. And even they started as “Apple Computers, inc”, because they wouldn’t have gotten just “Apple” if they had tried.