Back in 2021, Google Fiber got a new logo after using just a wordmark for the past decade. The latest branding change has Google Fiber increasingly leverage “GFiber.”

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      A nearby city was in the running once but it was dropped from the running. high speed Internet is finally becoming at least a little more popular in stone areas. There are a couple companies building that in my area and I got $60 gigabit last year.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      This isn’t a news community. It’s a technology community. Google & Google fiber are technology companies. I didn’t see anything in the sidebar saying posts like this are verboten.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          1 because if you hear about gfiber coming to your area now you immediately know it’s a Google product. Whether that’s positive or negative in your opinion.

          2 you may not have known that Google fiber isn’t directly connected to the Google search company. There both largely independent subsidiaries of the alphabet parent company.

          If you really don’t care then just ignore it and move on. Or downvote and move on. You’ve interacted with this post quite a bit for someone who doesn’t care about it.

      • wmassingham@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Top of the sidebar:

        This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

        Business rebrands aren’t technology news or articles.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    GFiber sounds like one of those fly by night companies on Amazon.

        • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The jig is up with that whole “amazon’s choice” designation, I didn’t notice that it was bs till recently.

          Like of course it’s going to be the top pick if constrained to the same brand!

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are some keywords missing like ultra durable armored sleeve and maybe localized to fit the language with a literal translation.
        For bonus points show something like badly photoshopped lightnings between phone and cable.

        (Aliexpress shows “Kirsche MX kompatibel Schalter” for Cherry MX conpatible switches. Not wrong but a bit too literal)

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      And the best deal available to me, in a major US metropolitan area, within 2-5km of the highway, is 100Mb/s down, 5Mb/s up, for $60/mo. On copper, with no fiber options available.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      We just don’t get those kinds of prices here for a couple reasons. America is just so big, we largely live in single family homes, finally every company has to build its own infrastructure. Connecting all those individual houses is expensive. So either companies won’t or if they do the cost of the Internet access is expensive too.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          The last mile is a really expensive. Even a well intentioned company that wants to keep it’s prices low has difficulty building that last mile out. There just aren’t enough Americans who actually want government infrastructure like that. If enough people wanted them I firmly believe it would happen.

            • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Monopolies don’t exist every place. There are several companies in my area offering high speed Internet. One is in suburbs all around me but not in mine. They also have the cheapest costs. I called them asking when they might be expecting to my suburb and they said that my town (pop 60,000) will be one of the last because of how difficult it’ll be to get to every house. A different company moved in pay year and they cost more than the first one. State governments shouldn’t be allowed to block municipal Internet.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think I read somewhere that the US government gave some grants/subsidies to ISPs to build their fiber network? Surely this should translate to cheaper price?

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Unfortunately that’s not how it works. That works as an incentive to build not as a mechanism to bring down prices. For gigabit access in most markets that’ll cost at least $50 more likely closer to $100 a month. I pay $60

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It should work to bring down prices because the network would be paid for and so there’s less of a need to make up for costs. Doesn’t matter anyway, since the ISPs just pocketed the money and paid it out in bonuses rather than build what was promised.

            • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Should yes but the federal government doesn’t make conditions for the funds and if they do it’s just ignore without consequences.