A new report suggests many paper towel brands Canadians use are cut from the boreal forest.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In some places it might. And i guess in a sense all forests are managed…

        But yeah paper comes from trees. Trees grow in forests. Sawmills sell a lot of their chips and sawdust to pulp mills.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure (most of?) the patches of boreal forest in question are managed.

        Boreal just means northern and not the coastal rainforests or something. Y’know, the trees we have an almost endless amount of.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there’s a lot of trees up there, and they’re the kind that grow back reasonably fast. We should hope that’s where our paper is coming from.

    • GreasyTengu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its more economical to produce a low-value but high volume product as close to where its being used.

      Were people thinking that their big bulky packs of toilet paper were being shipped by boat across the pacific from china? The shipping cost would wipe out any profits.

  • Drusas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The top three major American tissue makers—P&G, Kimberly-Clark, and Georgia-Pacific—earned “F” scores across each of their flagship brands like Charmin, Cottonelle, and Quilted Northern across all five editions of NRDC’s Issue with Tissue scorecard.

    Basically, it’s the best brands in terms of functionality and comfort.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Dumb, sensational article. Managed northern forests are where you want your wood to come from.

      This group gives better scores to bamboo products that have to be shipped around the world with fossil fuels, wiping out most of the carbon-negativity that comes from harvesting woody plants. Once again, the forest is missed for the trees in the environmental movement, so to speak.

      • SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, we could get a perfect score if we destroyed all the coastal rainforests and replaced them with bamboo plantations.