Lee Duna@lemmy.nzcake to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoGoogle witness accidentally blurts out that Apple gets 36% cut of Safari dealarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1424cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1424external-linkGoogle witness accidentally blurts out that Apple gets 36% cut of Safari dealarstechnica.comLee Duna@lemmy.nzcake to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·8 months agoIOS is closed source and doesn’t allow side loading, it shouldn’t be considered in privacy discussions
minus-squareinterceder270@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 months agoWhy not? Isn’t apple able to push whatever they want to user’s phones without their permission, like they were paid to do with the U2 album?
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoI mean that it can’t be considered secure or privacy focused
IOS is closed source and doesn’t allow side loading, it shouldn’t be considered in privacy discussions
Why not? Isn’t apple able to push whatever they want to user’s phones without their permission, like they were paid to do with the U2 album?
I mean that it can’t be considered secure or privacy focused