TikTok says it’s not the algorithm, teens are just pro-Palestine — The company denied allegations that it has been promoting pro-Palestine content in an effort to sway American opinion::In a blog post, the company denied allegations that it has been promoting pro-Palestine content in an effort to sway American opinion.

  • Whoresradish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hamas is as bad as Isreal, but they are Isreal’s own creation. Most Palestinians don’t support Hamas just like most Isrealis don’t support their own government. It is two governments trying to commit genocide on the others civilians. Their are no good guys here. Just thousands of innocent civilians being massacred on both sides. The main difference is the US has decided to give one of these governments committing genocide the most advanced weapons available and practically no governments are even trying to help the Palestinians anymore. Not to mention hamas is commiting genocide to take back land the palestinians had a 100 years ago while the isrealis are commiting genocide to take back land they had 2000 years ago while pretending the palestians never even existed and spouting off racist revisionist history.

    • GoldenAxeDwarf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Except Israel is a country that wants to live in peace and Hamas has IT IN THEIR FUCKING CHARTER that they want to kill all Jews.

      And when Hamas actually acts on their charter, the whole world goes shocked-Pikachu-face and condemns Israel for self defense and not agreeing to just be killed

      • HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No. Hamas’ charter was written at a time when Israel was committing atrocities in Palestine. It was written in anger by about half a dozen people. Noam Chomsky explains this pretty well. The original charter is basically irrevelent and has basically been disavowed by Hamas.

      • endhits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        “living in peace” is not invading someone’s land, taking their homes, slaughtering them, and putting them in a concentration camp for decades while killing kids when they retaliate.

        • GoldenAxeDwarf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You mean returning to the homeland after the Holocaust to a country as per UN resolutions , self-defense from terrorism in civilian areas (like suicide bombers and rockets into cities), and unilaterally disengaging from the Gaza Strip in 2005 while giving millions of dollars to a corrupt system that embezzled most of what wasn’t used to build weapons and terrorism infrastructure and teach children to love death and murdering Jews in their beds like they did on October 7th

          • endhits@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You don’t get the use the homeland excuse by saying “oh well we were here 2,000 years ago”.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, Hamas isn’t as bad as Israel, it’s literally a resistance movement to the people that ethnically cleansed their population from their land and kept them in a concentration camp for two decades. The unbalanced condemnation tbph is the result of a concerted Israeli/Western propaganda campaign to obscure the context and nature of the attacks, including the hundreds of Palestinian people killed in 2023 before Oct. 7, and more fundamentally, the fact that Israel has been keeping 2.4M people in a high-tech concentration camp for the last two decades.

      The atrocity claims against Hamas from Oct. 7 have some serious evidentiary issues at this point, even including some unknown number of the civilian deaths being attributable to the IDF (literally firing at, shelling and bombing Israeli citizens - though to be clear, there is video of Hamas shooting civilians as well). You compare this to the inhuman genocide being levied against Palestinians now - food, water, electricity, fuel, medicine being cut off for 5 weeks at this point, likely upwards of 20,000 civilians killed, at least half of the buildings in Gaza damaged or destroyed, attacks on hospitals, schools, refugee camps, ambulances, journalists, aid workers, without legitimate substantiation of their repurposing for military purposes - these are crimes against humanity. There is no equivalence here.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Hamas shouldn’t be even compared to Israel. Hamas is a fucked up religious/fascist terrorist organization, whereas Israel is one of the happiest and modern western countries in the world. In no way can it be said that Hamas is even on the same scale when talking about evil.

      • Whoresradish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        How is Isreal not also a “fucked up religious/fascist terrorist organization”?

        You describe Isreal as happy and modern as some kind of defense, but having overwhelming military superiorty over neighbors, taking their land, and having extremely close ties with modernized western countries would cause that.

        How exactly is Isreal not religious (state religion is Judaism). How is it not terroristic (you kill one of their citizens they kill 10 of your citizens and take your land)? How is it not fascist when Gaza is literally a concentration camp for 2 million people? Two wrongs don’t make a right, and having bigger guns certainly doesn’t make them righteous.

        I wonder if the fact they aren’t muslim or as brown makes them better to you?

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          having overwhelming military superiorty over neighbors

          They didn’t start that way. They built that capability out of very real necessity, coming many times pretty close to annihilation.

          taking their land

          By internationally agreed decisions, and after winning wars, I suppose?

          and having extremely close ties with modernized western countries

          Yes, that’s a good idea. Every country should do that.

          How exactly is Isreal not religious (state religion is Judaism)

          State religion is perhaps an alien concept for Americans (which I guesstimate you are), but it’s a pretty normal thing in Europe. It doesn’t say much about religiousity, although clearly Israel has more crazy in that department than Europe, but also quite a lot less than typical muslim countries.

          As for Israel, the largest religious group (33% in 2016) is “Judaism/Hiloni”, which is essentially a secularist/nonobserving version of Judaism. The actual number of secularists might be even actually higher.

          How is it not terroristic (you kill one of their citizens they kill 10 of your citizens and take your land)?

          Terrorism isn’t defined by numbers. It’s defined by tactics and intentions.

          How is it not fascist when Gaza is literally a concentration camp for 2 million people?

          It’s literally not a concentration camp for 2 million people. You need to look up concentration camps.

          I wonder if the fact they aren’t muslim or as brown makes them better to you?

          Color has nothing do with it. Islamistic terrorism is a significant enemy of human civilization, however. That indeed does make them better for me.

          • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            State religion is perhaps an alien concept for Americans (which I guesstimate you are), but it’s a pretty normal thing in Europe.

            Of the Union’s 27 states, only three have an official state religion, these being Denmark (Church of Denmark), Greece (Church of Greece), and Malta (Catholic Church).

            Out of 27 countries, only three have official religions and they’re pretty small. Don’t talk shit out of your ass maybe?

            • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Where did you grab that bullshit data from, ChatGPT? I live in a EU country that has an official state religion, and it’s none of those three countries. Or is there some semantic thing going on here? Is it not an official state religion even though it’s directly funded by the government, and government officials attend official religious events regularly?

              Don’t talk shit out of your ass maybe?

              Right back at you, buddy.