Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: ‘It’s a national security threat’::WPDE covers news, sports, weather, and local events in and around the Grand Strand, Pee Dee, and the Border Belt.

  • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unpopular opinion: internet discourse would be slightly more civil if people’s real names were attached to their Internet Hot Takes.

    But yeah, have fun enforcing that, Nikki.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah Facebook radicalized a lot of people all with their names attached. People fucking showed their face while attempting a coup. We’ve got some real fucking idiots in America

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      internet discourse would be slightly more civil if people’s real names were attached to their Internet Hot Takes.

      Let’s say that you’re right. Everyone’s words are now connected to their identities. Instead of expressing themselves openly, people now censor themselves because they’re afraid of how their family will react when they talk about wanting to transition, they’re afraid of how their social activities will be judged by future employers, and they’re generally afraid to make any mistakes that might be held against them for the rest of their lives because it’s difficult to remove information from the internet once it’s there. Is this a better world? Politeness through fear and surveillance?

      • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree with you. But there’s also a flip side. Nazis and other bigots wouldn’t be so open in their bigotry, which could lead to them recruiting fewer people to their cause. Also, state actors such as Russia and China wouldn’t be able to sow mis- and disinformation so readily.

        For the record, I believe Nikki’s plan is dumb and will never, ever happen. I’m just using my imagination to see some potential for benefits.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Got a wake up call for you

          They would only enforce it against the ones speaking out against the bigots and nazis.

          This is a way to track online dissidents who will be a threat to project 2025

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      internet discourse would be slightly more civil if people’s real names were attached

      It was that way in the very beginning of the internet (before www and during the first years of www).

      Everthing was relatively civil, and most people went by real names or by mostly well-known nicknames/pseudonyms.

      Then money moved in and took control. Anonymity (as opposed to pseudonymity) became neccessary sometimes.

      Then huge waves of stupid people moved in and believed that they were in control. Anonymity and pseudonymity was everywhere (and hardly anyone knew the difference).

      The bad news: Neither money nor stupid people have any plans to move out.