Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The reason a lot of people think that way, is that any truly progressive candidate isn’t backed by the DNC.

    Also, very recently, AOC was denied a seat at the table for a dying, cancer ridden old white guy. Granted, it wasn’t a spot in an election, but her own party looked the other way for a leadership role.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s worse than that, the DNC will pour millions into establishment campaigns to crush any progressive primary challengers.

      Perfect example - we could have had a wonderful progressive win in Texas, Jessica Cisneros, a few years back. Instead Pelosi stepped in with millions to back Henry Cuellar, who went on to vote with republicans like 95% of the time.

      Time after time this happens, and frankly it has completely turned me off to the idea that the democrat party can be “fixed.” The corruption is too endemic, we need to start fresh with a new leftist party to have any hope of meaningful representation in Washington.

        • grumps@lemmy.i.secretponi.es
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Or it speaks to the “norms” that Democrats slavishly adhere to.

          AOC is relatively a junior member of Congress. I disagree with the “norms” nonsense in this day and age but the point is that not every action has a deeper meaning and those who keep parroting this belief have clearly never worked with a large number of people before.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, but committee seats are where the establishment has explicit power. It’s easy to connect establishment whims with that very same establishment electing their choice. It’s a huge stretch to extend that to them dictating the votes of millions of people.