• Pasta4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Spotify already pays nearly 70% of every dollar it generates from music to the record labels and publishers that own the rights for music, and represent and pay artists and songwriters," it continues.>

    I dunno, ifnthat is true it seems more than fair compensation.

    • SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair compensation for who? Record labels who already rake in tons of money, or small artists that now need 1000 streams a year at minimum to get paid at all on a specific track?

      • Thassodar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been making and distributing my own music for over 3 years, not only on Spotify, and JUST hit a total $26 I’ve made.

    • oDDmON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do know why bands and artists sell merch at venues, right?

      The contracts they’ve signed may entitle them to little or nothing of ticket sales.

    • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t as simple as “Spotify Bad”, you’re right.

      It’s that the default contracts for artists are outdated, written for the world of cd and record sales. In the new world of streaming, artists need to bargain for greater rights to streaming proceeds in their contacts - and they’re working on it, but god knows the publishers don’t want to give anything up.

      Spotify as a company barely makes money; I’ve heard they’re actually in the red. The villains are the labels, and Spotify and other streaming services are the weapon they are using to rip off their artists.