• bestnerd@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That’s a really weird take for someone who looks to be trying to run in the ‘28 race. Why this stance over all the others you’ve taken? This would have been a grand slam policy along with the others he’s approved this minth

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      How is it weird? Unions will endorse him no matter what he does because he’s running against the red team, might as well fuck them over.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Some people seem to think that Democrats need to actually do things to keep the unions loyal, like American politics is about trading favors and negotiating alliances. In reality all the Democrats need to do is point at the Republican boogeyman and the unions fall in line.

          • bestnerd@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree. The dems need to show more to the unions. But if they do that then they lose the donations from the bigger corporations. No matter what it’s a lose lose game for the workers

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              A labor party would definitely have less money to work with, but more volunteers and their volunteers would more enthusiastic.

              It would get ugly, though. America’s government doesn’t like labor parties.