tsonfeir
reported this comment because you quoted his comment, which broke community rules.
Same thing as fair use - you weren’t making the comment, you were arguing against the comment. Leaving it. tsonfeir can deal with the shame of his words.
Gave them a 7-day ban for that comment, plus trying to win an argument via reporting you.
There’s got to be easier ways…
I’m your huckleberry
the modlogs show that we do take action, but only when justified. Just because you feel something is justified, that doesn’t mean you’re right.
A report doesn’t mean you’ll get what you want. Moderators will review the report, and see if it has merit.
Insulting us is the best way to make us do our job /s
I understood from the outset. Have a great day!
Ah yeah. Please explain how that is a personal attack. They surmised that something must be affecting your taste buds if you find that the two drinks taste the same. That would be an accurate summation if they feel the two taste very dissimilar.
I didn’t get personal. Sorry if you took it personally.
I actually agree with Treczoks about them not tasting remotely the same.
My wife gets the extra creamy oat milk. I can easily tell it’s not regular milk, and it’s just not for me. I honestly tried to like it.
That’s not me, though. I try to keep things civil. If you find it funny to fuck with people, that’s you. If it’s in a community I moderate, I’ll do what my rules say I do. Simple as that. I moderate because people ask for help in moderation, and I try to be fair about it. Some people take it personally, and that’s on them.
I have nothing against you or your views. I only moderate you when you break community rules. The modlog doesn’t lie.
Comments removed:
Comment: You just admitted to being suckered by someone you think is a troll -or- falsely accused someone of being a troll because you’re desperate to ‘win’ against an anonymous internet stranger. Thanks for the laughs- Bye, Felicia! [Rule 1]
Comment: >Right. You aren’t worth engaging with. If you believed that you’d just walk away. but you couldn’t help yourself- I’m in your head. Reeks of “need to win” desperation but I love that scent ;) [Rule 1]
Usually I’d wait for 3 violations, but you were trolling hard in that thread. I only gave a 1-day ban, but wow, I’m flattered that I got a post about me because of it.
Compelling speech is a violation of the first amendment.
Yeah, I wish they could force it, but they can’t. They might be able to come to an agreement between both parties that if the defendant did XYZ, the plaintiff would reduce damages by X amount.
I don’t see that happening, though.
It’s amazing what people can turn into an insult.
I live in a “flyover state”. What does that say about me?
I mean, surely it means something, or you said it for no reason.
Please, psychoanalyze me based on where I live.
There is no such onus. If you don’t want to go through a paywall, feel free to find an alternate source.
3 deputy U.S. Marshalls killed. 8 total officers wounded/dead. They were serving a warrant against someone having a gun that isn’t allowed to. 1 accused dead. Others in custody.
Bad response, but not a racial slur - means idiot Cajun.
Restored, but take your downvotes
It appears they edited the title a number of times. First title was “Israel-Hamas war: How an aid convoy in Gaza became Israel’s target”
Just checked. it does match. They are using the new title. AP changed the title post-publishing, but failed to change the header title.
Our rules are clear. We remove all content that is reported if it breaks our rules. That means I’ve removed some comments by you, as well as ones against you. Just because you would rather we kept things you agree with up, that doesn’t mean we are performing “censorship to serve an agenda”
As a mod at !news@lemmy.world , I appreciate the positive call-out!
Locking this down.
Too many heated comments