The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that Biden isn’t really much less of a warhawk, but the point I’m making is that there’s probably been if anything slightly less genocide by the US under Biden than other presidents, which just makes the nickname more ridiculous.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that he’s much less of a warhawk, he’s no less of a warhawk.

      Yes, the nickname is dumb, but that’s mostly because it’s a Trumpism, not that it doesn’t have a tinge of accuracy to it.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dunno, I still think there’s a valid point to it. Previous presidents increased the amount of genocide, they continued and added to previous actions, Biden has done things to decrease it.

        Like, if you were to plot genocide on a logarithmic scale, the slope would be lesser under Biden.

        Like, if inflation has been really high, but then becomes a bit less high.

        It’s objectively better. Still definitely not good, but not as bad as before, but also still not getting better quickly enough.