• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    there’s always a significant additional bureaucratic cost when selling a house and buying another one.

    This really only affects landlords and estate agents. Most people looking for a home are looking for a place to stay for life, and any “bureaucratic cost”, if you’re purely talking about red tape, form-filling, phone calls etc, is more than worth it for a lifetime home. Again, citation needed. If you’re talking about a literal monetary cost… whoa, look at that - capitalism!

    renting has at least a single clear benefit beyond just being able to afford it: greater flexibility

    “Flexibility” is a daft measure, only useful for people who plan to move often, which, again, is not common, except in the case of people needing to move often for work, which - hey, it’s capitalism again!

    Also, the financial risk is almost zero when you rent.

    “Almost” is doing a lot of work in this sentence. The risk of being made homeless by your landlord for petty reasons is a pretty clear risk. Having your rent hiked is a financial risk. Having to bite the bullet and choose an expensive place to rent because it’s the only one reasonably close to work is a financial risk. Being under someone’s thumb to provide them income is itself an inherent financial risk.

    And by the way - what do you think causes the financial risk of home ownership, since you’re so intent on proving my point for me?

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And by the way - what do you think causes the financial risk of home ownership

      Accidents, subpar maintenance, market changes, divorce.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Try and think a little more deeply. An accident in itself is not a financial risk. Even flooding isn’t inherently a financial risk. Do you know what is?

        Also, “market changes” is a part of what I’m pointing at ;)

        It’s capitalism!

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            fosforus uses deflection!

            It’s not very effective!

            Answer me instead of making bad jokes, coward.

            By the way - are you unaware of the incredible self own inherent in this? In your attempt to “recommend” a book for more information on these issues, you recommend “basic economics”. Well…

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Dude. It was entirely a deflection. Answer my fucking comment. I have literally no need whatsoever to respect your “recommendation”. It was an attempt to avoid answering my statements and nothing more than that. So go ahead, answer. Or are you too scared?

                Also, I have Cowbee’s statements to lean on, which you yourself conceded to, to know what the book is like.

                • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Answer my fucking comment.

                  Read the book. Educate yourself beyond the crap you’ve studied so far.

                  Also, I have Cowbee’s statements to lean on, which you yourself conceded to, to know what the book is like.

                  I conceded that he has such an opinion.

                  Do you need more internet points for being so incredible?

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Still not an answer. You can say all you like, but until you answer you are only continuing to deflect.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oof, unironically suggesting Sowell? Might as well toss in Prager-U, or DailyWire.

            • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Ok, so which multiple award-winning, widely respected PhD of Economics would you suggest instead? Or you just against things instead of having any positions of your own, like most other deep-end socialists are?

              • Cowbee@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                For one, I wouldn’t recommend a clown that supports removing the minimum wage, or argues that colonization was a good thing. Recommending a far-right Chicago economist, who is far-right even by Chicago school standards, is laughably absurd.

                I have many positions of my own. Decentralization is key, as is democratization, and this extends to production. I think protecting worker power is key, and I think Imperialism and colonization are terrible. As such, I can’t agree with recommending Sowell.

                All of those are reasons why I’m a leftist and am on Lemmy, rather than a Capitalist site like Reddit.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Henry Kissinger won a nobel peace prize lmao

                Capitalist awards often mean you are bad at the thing they’re commending you for