flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square257fedilinkarrow-up11.6Kfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up11.6Kexternal-linkEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square257fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year ago I understand they are two separate judges, but the law should be the same for all, not at the interpretation of whichever judge you get. That’s literally a big chunk of law. So there must be something other than it just being the judge’s interpretation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_law
That’s literally a big chunk of law. So there must be something other than it just being the judge’s interpretation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_law
This was a jury trial.