Recalling almost every Tesla in America won’t fix safety issues, experts say::undefined

    • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      “intended for use on controlled access highways…with center dividers and clear markings and no cross traffic”

      So it’s lame assist, not auto pilot. Which has been around for a while. Fucking Elon.

      • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Edit: lane assist, but leaving as lame assist cause it seems appropriate.

        Also don’t know why I responded to a comment and not the original thread.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    At what point does Musk become more akin to Elizabeth Holmes?

    Fully Autonomous Driving = Edison Machine?

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Holmes had no product. Musk on the other hand singlehandedly popularized electric cars, reusable space rockets and satellite internet. Hate him all you want, but that is not a fair comparison. Musk’s issue is that he over promises and under delivers. He still does deliver but he fails to meet people’s expectations that he himself set.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Tesla this week agreed to issue a remote update to 2 million cars aimed at improving driver attention while Autopilot is engaged, especially on surface roads with cross traffic and other hazards the driver-assistance technology is not designed to detect.

    Tesla has repeatedly acknowledged in user manuals, legal documents and communications with federal regulators that Autosteer is “intended for use on controlled-access highways” with “a center divider, clear lane markings, and no cross traffic.”

    Officials and lawmakers expressed concern that NHTSA may have been reluctant to come down harder on the automaker, which has a cultlike following among consumers and enormous influence over the country’s transition to electric vehicles — a priority for the Biden administration.

    In a statement, NHTSA spokeswoman Veronica Morales said, “It is now Tesla’s responsibility under the law to provide a remedy, free of charge to consumers, that fully addresses the safety defect.”

    Jennifer Homendy, the chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an investigative body that has been critical of the approach taken by regulators at NHTSA, said she was pleased to see the agency take action, though it comes seven years after the first known Autopilot fatality.

    Other automakers such as Ford, General Motors and Subaru include driver-assistance software in their vehicles, but the Tesla crashes involving Autopilot have come under repeated scrutiny from federal agencies.


    The original article contains 1,314 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!