![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://linux.community/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
What’s minor in this case? The fact that it’s not specified makes me think we’re speaking of a 17 year old.
I prioritize ethics over optics even if it means facing criticism.
Sharing my honest beliefs, welcoming constructive debates, and embracing the potential for evolving viewpoints. Independent thinker navigating through conversations without allegiance to any particular side.
What’s minor in this case? The fact that it’s not specified makes me think we’re speaking of a 17 year old.
Spending even 5 seconds reading the article would’ve spared your time spent writing this message
I prefer 1080p but if not available then 720p is perfectly fine as well. 4k is overkill and I don’t even have a monitor that could play it at native resolution. Where I do prefer “lower quality” though is framerate. I don’t like how 60fps looks so I force YouTube to play videos at 24fps.
I don’t think that’s fair. AI wont turn a bad photograph into a good one. It’s a tool that quickly and automatically does something we’ve been doing by hand untill now. That’s kind of like saying a photoshopped picture isn’t “good” or “real”. They’re all photoshopped. Not a single serious photographer releases unedited photos except perhaps the ones shooting on film.
I’ve blocked several of the most active posters here and I don’t notice any difference on my feed. Neither would you.
Maybe. Maybe not. Intelligence and consciousness may also just be an emergent feature of information processing. LLMs process information. Whose to say that there’s zero chance of the lights coming on one day. I personally tend to be distrustful of people who speak as if they have absolute knowledge.
AI can be extremely dangerous in either case. LLMs are no different from that perspective.
Not a single absolute claim has been made.
I don’t personally think there’s necessarily anything wrong callin LLM an AI. After all; autocorrect could be considered an AI aswell. The main issue is that people speak of AI when they actually mean AGI or ASI. That’s why they have unrealistic expectation from things like GPT4.
Wether the LLM route is a dead end I have no idea. It might but it might not. Because LLMs sometimes makes mistakes that are so obvious to us humans it seems to make many people dismiss it as fundamentally flawed but I don’t think we’re giving it the credit it deserves. Humans make mistakes aswell but if there was a person with an equivalent capability to source expert level knowledge on such an insanely wide range of topics it would seem insane to describe them anything else but a genious.
What does this have to do with AI? Or are you talking about unconsciouss LLMs?
A true, consciouss artificial intelligence has the potential to experience things way more deeply that humans could even comprehend.
Many new cars have a carwash mode. Not in any way exclusive to the cybertruck.
No it’s not.
It only prompts you with a warning that it can be considered a slur in some occasions but it’s not banned and wont prevent you from using it.
So I assume that since it was withdrawn, this doesn’t set a precedent and it’s only a matter of time untill they try to sneak it thru with a different name.
I was about to say. That was a surprisingly good game. I really liked the mood of it and the story.
In my opinion the shortest answer to this would be: When you go from index funds to individual stocks
I must be watching different videos than the people complaining about YouTube comments. The ones I see are virtually all positive.
I agree but there’s also an add-on for that
Are you on the spectrum?
Very likely.
Would it make you feel better if you noted that the scrolling red banner at the top of the website does in fact have “this water ain’t woke” among other similar sayings? And there is a “This drink ain’t woke” Yeti cooler.
I went to their website and did not see such banner but if that indeed is the case then that’s all the proof I need to admit I was wrong.
Does it make me feel better? No, it makes me feel sad.
The title of the article is intentionally misleading readers for clicks and rage bait. They’re not calling it “anti-woke water”, thedailybeast is. The name of the brand is Freedom2o. Is freedom anti-woke?
They’re even talking about how their water is good for the environment.
Support environmental sustainability by choosing reverse osmosis water. Our water bottles are crafted with a reduced environmental footprint, ensuring that your commitment to clean water aligns with a broader dedication to preserving our planet.
Sounds pretty woke to me!
The same cheap dark roast from LIDL that I always drink