Netflix Resumes Advertising on X After Elon Musk Controversy::Netflix has resumed advertising on X following a suspension by the streamer and other brands after Elon Musk promoted an antisemitic post.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    I did not take business classes so limited background but if we assume that the US isn’t going to magically transition away from capitalism, we instead have to find a way to legislate a transition to a more ethical capitalism. That phrase seems to be an oxymoron but for things to not keep getting progressively worse I’m thinking we as a society need to figure out a way to make it happen. Any ideas? You seem to have at least taken a course in the matter.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean that’s probably the preferred path but I can’t see how that realistically happens. There are too many individuals globally with too much to lose that will think their loss of capital is worth bringing down the whole human race. I’m sure they would rather see the world in ashes rather than succeed under an alternate system where they may not be on top.

        • colforge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not even about being on top or being worried about losing status - I’d be fine with giving up what little I have to see a better world. The problem is that a pivot away from capitalism isn’t going to happen without violent revolution, because it would absolutely be met with violent resistance.

          I wouldn’t support something that would be guaranteed to thrust my children and grandchildren into a world of chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that would unavoidably arise during and potentially after a revolution of that scale. And someone has to be holding the levers of power in the end, and how do we guarantee that we don’t just end up shuffling the deck around but playing the exact same game?

          It’s easy to be idealistic and say “this isn’t working” but it’s a whole lot harder to convince enough people to dismantle it and deal with the consequences rather than attempt to effect incremental change over a long term.

        • Andy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think there’s a credible case to be made that moving toward socialism has benefits even for the wealthy, and that the change doesn’t have to be presented as the end of capitalism.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, let’s not. Or at least let’s change it to something better this time, not worse.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Why don’t you take a list of countries by quality of life from some point in the past decade or two, and see which nations seem to always top it.

          Spoiler: they’re the ones with hybrid economies and highly regulated markets.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yes, capitalist free-market countries almost exclusively. That’s the thing I’d rather not have others break.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Do you not know what a “mixed economy” is? Did you even look at a list? Denmark, Norway, Sweden… You think these are "capitalist free-market countries"and that’s why they top the list?

              The reason those countries are at the top of the list for quality of life is because they have regulations on their markets, and robust social safety nets.

              Maybe actually do a few minutes of honest, open minded research about quality of life.

              • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Did you even look at a list? Denmark, Norway, Sweden… You think these are "capitalist free-market countries"and that’s why they top the list?

                Yes, they obviously are capitalist free-market economies.

                Perhaps you should read something like https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0465060730 before going on with this line of conversation? It should cover most of what you seem to be lacking.

                • prole@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  For fuck sake. I will repeat my question:

                  Do you not know what a mixed economy is?

                  Because no, they are not purely “capitalist free market economies.” At all.

                  Perhaps that bit isn’t covered in the one book you’ve read?