Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Also not every profession is entitled to income

    Yes it is. Otherwise it is not a profession. People go to school for years to become professional artists. They are absolutely entitled to income.

    But hey, you want your murals painted by robots and your wall art printed out, have fun. I’m not interested in your brave new world.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        So you think you’re not entitled to income from your work? That doesn’t sound like something a professional would say. “I’m obsolete, don’t pay me.”

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Nah I understand what’s going on. AI is not replacing real artists. It’s replacing sweatshops. And even when it will eventually replace most of art grunt work we’ll find something more interesting to do like curate the art, mix, match, add extra meta layers and so on.

          This closed mind protectionism is just silly. Not only it’s not sustainable because you will never win it’s also incredibly desperate. No real artist would cry and whine here when given this super power.

          Also pay is not everything in life. Maybe think about that for a second when you discuss art

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Pay is not everything in life, but it does buy things like paint and canvases.

            And I really have to question a self-proclaimed professional artist saying, again, that artists do not deserve to be paid for their work.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              “Deserve” - clearly you don’t understand the issue at hand if you’re using definitions like this. There’s no “deserve” in art.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, they don’t.

              Work has to have value.

              Some work - some art - has value. Some does not.

              Sometimes you spend money and buy lumber and build a chair and you can sell it because it is worth something to someone. Sometimes it’s shit and goes in the trash.

              Just because you made a chair doesn’t mean you get money.

              • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                This thread is incredibly disconnected to the point where it seems to be invaded by hobby artists that think too highly of themselves.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The robots are far better at giving me what I want than humans ever were, so yeah, I I ironically am stoked for robot wall art and murals