• Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with that is, if they join, they will have the most active communities. Everyone will naturally want to use those instead of the less active ones in other communities.

    So, in that case, defederation may end up harming the userbase. After that, they’d basically have to rebuild the communities that got abandoned for the larger ones on Threads. Some users may even jump ship to Threads to continue using the communities they’ve become accustomed to.

    So the question is: defederate and potentially harm your instance, possibly even irreparably, or stay federated and continue allowing Facebook to do what it wants?

    • FlordaMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We build this entire reddit alternative without interconnectivity with reddit, why couldn’t we do that again if threads decides to do that. People will be familiar with how lemmy works and there will be no ads here, so I don’t completely see a problem. Plus the format of lemmy is completely different from threads right?

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We build this entire reddit alternative without interconnectivity with reddit, why couldn’t we do that again if threads decides to do that.

        We could, but we’d basically have to start over again. It wouldn’t be quite from scratch, but it’d be pretty close.

        Plus the format of lemmy is completely different from threads right?

        It depends on how Facebook implements ActivityPub. For comparison, Mastodon and Lemmy both use ActivityPub. Mastodon users can actually search for and comment on Lemmy posts (each Lemmy post and comment appears as a new Mastodon post), but, due to Mastodon having a specific option in ActivityPub turned off (I don’t remember which one), the reverse is not true.