Mazdak@lemmy.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe first minds to be controlled by generative AI will live inside video gameswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1232
arrow-up1232external-linkThe first minds to be controlled by generative AI will live inside video gameswww.cnbc.comMazdak@lemmy.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNo such thing has been “mathematically proven.” The emergent behavior of ML models is their notable characteristic. The whole point is that their ability to do anything is emergent behavior.
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoHere’s a white paper explicitly proving: No emergent properties (illusory due to bad measures) Predictable linear progress with model size https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004 The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSure, if you define “emergent abilities” just so. It’s obvious from context that this is not what I described.
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTheir paper uses industry standard definitions
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoTheir paper uses terminology that makes sense in context. It’s not a definition of “emergent behavior.”
No such thing has been “mathematically proven.” The emergent behavior of ML models is their notable characteristic. The whole point is that their ability to do anything is emergent behavior.
Here’s a white paper explicitly proving:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004
The field changes fast, I understand it is hard to keep up
Sure, if you define “emergent abilities” just so. It’s obvious from context that this is not what I described.
Their paper uses industry standard definitions
Their paper uses terminology that makes sense in context. It’s not a definition of “emergent behavior.”