After setting foot on the Moon, the next destination for humankind is Mars, which presents a whole new set of challenges in speedy, long-distance space travel.

  • Desistance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I heard that the destination is actually Venus because it’s closer and has oxygen in the upper atmosphere.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Venus is significantly more hostile than Mars, so while we definitely want to do more with Venus, Luna and Mars are clear next-ups for manned landings.

      While all of Mars is hostile to human life, Venus is also incredibly hostile to equipment, and thus requires a different approach to even unmanned launches.

      Current maximum lifetime for any unmanned craft in the Venusian atmosphere (to say nothing of the ground) is only about 2 hours.

      • sndrtj@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Venus is interesting. While the surface is extremely hostile, the upper atmosphere is maybe the most similar to Earth-like environment out there in the solar system. At about 50km up in the air, the air pressure is about 1 Earth atmosphere, and the ambient temperature is about 20C. A 80/20% nitrogen-oxygen gas mixture is buoyant too at that depth, so a balloon filled with breathable air will just float. A rupture won’t cause explosive decompression like it would on Mars either. In addition, the gravity one would experience is only very slightly less than that of Earth, and the large atmosphere also provides some shielding against radiation.

        Mars doesn’t have these perks. Mars is cold, really cold, with only 1/3rd of the gravity of Earth, has practically no radiation shielding, and any breach would cause explosive decompression and almost instant unconsciousness. On top of that, regular solar panels really don’t work that well on Mars because of the extra distance from the Sun, while solar panels would actually work better in the upper atmosphere of Venus.

      • danielbln@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Isn’t that on the surface? I believe Venus’s upper atmosphere is a lot more welcoming.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s true about their upper atmosphere, but we’re nowhere close to being able to capitalize on it (as in, no missions even planned). Closest we’ve got on paper is an orbiter by the early 30s.

          Hopefully in my lifetime we see an upper atmosphere balloon or something. That alone would be unbelievably cool.

          • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            give me a hot air balloon and a hang glider and send me out Ill be the pioneer

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Dude what’s neat about this is Oxygen on Venus is like Helium on Earth (less dense than most of the atmosphere, so rises naturally) so your balloon doesn’t even need to be hot, just really sturdy.