• Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well Russia hasn’t managed to destroy Ukraine’s existing manufacturing capacity

    they have though

    Minister of Strategic Industries Kamyshin claimed a twenty-fold increase in artillery shell production over 2023 a couple of months ago

    they can claim whatever they want for propaganda, in the real world we can observe their artillery shortages and failed offensives

    despite Ukraine’s lack of a real airforce, has not been able to successfully establish air superiority

    you don’t need air superiority to destroy a factory, please put aside the wishful thinking for 5 minutes if you can

    troops can retreat, equipment can be relocated somewhere else, a factory is a static building that you CANNOT MOVE, no matter how much air defense you put near it eventually a missile, drone or shell will go through and damage/destroy it

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Russia is one of the biggest artillery manufacturers and stockpilers in the entire world and even they’re suffering some shell constraints. There is a lot of space between “literally all the ammunition you could want” and “zero ammunition”, especially in a conflict like this. Both sides are fighting in a way that will eat basically any volume of artillery ammunition that is available. So no, shell constraints do not indicate a totally destroyed domestic industry.

      a factory is a static building that you CANNOT MOVE

      That’s why you don’t build it near the front line. Ukraine is big. Russian aircraft attacking a factory in Kyiv or even further west would have to spend absolutely ages in extremely hostile airspace.