• LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think they weren’t ever going to use them because they know they would get nuked in turn. Once it became clear the bluff wasn’t working, makes you look weak to use a threat and not follow through.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        10 months ago

        While this may well be true, Russia has so many nukes and nukes are themselves so destructive that it’s kinda cold comfort even if 90% of them fail

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You wouldn’t even need a working one. A lot of nuclear responses work by going off the moment a likely missile fitting that criteria launches, since it would be too late otherwise.

            Someone making the wrong decision at a given time could easily cause everything to go up in a nuclear conflagration. It’s nearly happened before.

      • Forester@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Comrade what do with many ICBM no longer function?

        I have a best solution we take derelict submarine insert many warhead call it Poseidon. Is glorious Soviet superweapon Dah.

    • Sharpiemarker@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep. Mutually Assured Destruction.

      Some countries will use the threat of nuclear war to get what they want. But what they want often involves still being alive afterwards. Putin, like the rest of the leaders of countries with nuclear arms, knows that a nuclear strike demands a nuclear response. There is no other option and unfortunately the whole world suffers as a result.