• AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel very skeptical of this article coming completely out of left field compared to…literally everything else.

    • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you have been paying attention to the fronts. There’s maps that if accurate paint a not great picture for Ukraine. Every spot where they gain ground is matched with another spot where they lose.

      The first casualty of war is the truth, and I know I’ve had a very hard time trying to see through the B.S.

      The biggest indicator I’ve read is that US generals have been upset with the speed of the Ukrainian forces. Meaning they’re taking too long to take territory back. Just one example though.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s…a whole lotta nothing that someone could argue from either side of the argument.

        You really just sound like a propaganda worker than an actual person.

        • MORTARS@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Now you’re being paranoid and rude. They said they have a hard time seeing thru fog of war.

          They’re describing statements from the pentagon & maps from ISW. Quite well. So they clearly are just assuming the negatives both sides admit for themselves are true. That’s a good rational process for a casual observer, no?

          The US top brass is not as rosy on this as Reddit & the Ukrainian MOD &; their twitter OSINTers

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They didn’t describe anything what are you talking about?

            Some general they don’t know said they were upset with the speed of taking territory back, territory they don’t know. It’s the most vague example possible.

            Also you shifted in 2 minutes from “better butter yourself up” to “you’re being rude”. Sorry I’m going to need a second source.

            • MORTARS@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean obviously you don’t know what they were alluding to because you don’t check any source that would even repeat negative stuff Milley says

    • MORTARS@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a hardcore imperialist pro-US source dude you’d better butter yourself up

        • MORTARS@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol you’re almost starting to try to get it, huh. You’re so fucked I’m ahead by two years. Two years you drank the koolaid.

          No shit they would rather be fighting a war they’re not actively losing. Go look at the House Select Committee on China Chairman Gallagher’s beliefs.

            • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly.
              For Russia to win, they have to annex a large portion of Ukraine.
              For Ukraine to win, they have to gain lost territory back.
              For the US to win, the war has to go on as long as possible.

              It’s also important to remember that US aid is often a loan.