Almost five years ago, Saoirse “boats” wrote “Notes on a smaller Rust”, and a year after that, revisited the idea.

The basic idea is a language that is highly inspired by Rust but doesn’t have the strict constraint of being a “systems” language in the vein of C and C++; in particular, it can have a nontrivial (or “thick”) runtime and doesn’t need to limit itself to “zero-cost” abstractions.

What languages are being designed that fit this description? I’ve seen a few scripting languages written in Rust on GitHub, but none of them have been very active. I also recently learned about Hylo, which does have some ideas that I think are promising, but it seems too syntactically alien to really be a “smaller Rust.”

Edit to add: I think Graydon Hoare’s post about language design choices he would have preferred for Rust also sheds some light on the kind of things a hypothetical “Rust-like but not Rust” language could do differently: https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/307291.html

  • Reptorian@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You mean a interpretative language with similar role to Python, but more like Rust/C++ style? I actually want that so that I can ditch Python even if I learned it and use this instead.

    • BatmanAoD@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not necessarily interpreted, but possibly. I think a more likely path is something like Go that’s compiled but still has a garbage collector.

      • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you use a garbage collector the whole borrow checker would not make any sense.

        Do you want to have error handling and functional paradigms in go? I think you should start there and ask go Devs why their language is lacking such basic stuff.

        • 80avin@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not sure if this is what OP is seeking, but I would be fine to have borrow checker removed, replaced with Garbage collector like Go/Python in such a language.

          To build prototypes, I don’t want to fight with borrow checker and neither I care for efficiency much. But I do want the macro system, traits, lazily asynchronous runtime, cargo like package manager, easy build system, etc.

          Rust has so many powerful features, but only because of borrow checker (IMO) we can’t use it for rapid prototyping like Python. With that replaced, this subset of Rust would be something which can be a great contender to Python/Go, etc.

          • Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why would you want to prototype incorrect code? You don’t fight with the borrow checker. The borrow checker prevents stupid mistakes. Anything that is correct that the borrow checker rejects is almost certainly a very bad idea in a prototype