The art of vassalisation: How Russia’s war on Ukraine has transformed transatlantic relations
ecfr.eu
Europeans’ response to Russia’s war on Ukraine confirms their profound dependence on the US – an unwise position given the security challenge in Europe and coming geopolitical competition with China.

The report is absolutely scathing. Some choice quotes:

But when the next crisis came, both the US and the governments of Europe fell back on old models of alliance leadership. Europe, as EU high representative for foreign affairs Josep Borrell loudly lamented prior to Russia’s invasion, is not really at the table when it comes to dealing with the Russia-Ukraine crisis. It has instead embarked on a process of vassalisation.

But “alone” had a very specific meaning for Scholz. He was unwilling to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine unless the US also sent its own main battle tank, the M1 Abrams. It was not enough that other partners would send tanks or that the US might send other weapons. Like a scared child in a room full of strangers, Germany felt alone if Uncle Sam was not holding its hand.

Europeans’ lack of agency in the Russia-Ukraine crisis stems from this growing power imbalance in the Western alliance. Under the Biden administration, the US has become ever more willing to exercise this growing influence.

  • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t claim China was a dictatorship, it’s a market autocracy. Do keep up.

    And I’m not American so not sure why you keep quoting random text from who knows where about them

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      It’s not an autocracy, it’s a democracy as anybody who actually knows the first thing about China understands. It’s also demonstrably the fact because the government of China consistently works in the interest of the people of China. This is reflected by things such as massive poverty alleviation, infrastructure building, and so on. This is why the government of China has far higher approval than any western country. However, it’s not a western style parliamentary democracy. It’s a common mistake that uneducated westerners make to equate democracy with their own failed implementation of the concept.

      And I’m not American so not sure why you keep quoting random text from who knows where about them

      Well then answer, do you think that America is a and. strongman (autocratic military dictatorships)?

      Also, is your own country a strongman autocratic dictatorship given that it has made protesting illegal, and it’s torturing journalists?

      • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        China is not a liberal democracy. The Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state that China is democratic nonetheless. Many foreign and some domestic observers categorize China as an authoritarian one-party state, with some saying it adheres to neoauthoritarianism

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_in_China

        The government can pass laws in the UK, unpopular ones mean they get voted out

        What’s the process for the Chinese people?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          The government can pass laws in the UK, unpopular ones mean they get voted out

          You once again show a simplistic understanding of how your own political system works. The two parties you have that have a chance of wining are Conservatives and Labour. Both parties consistently pass policy that’s hostile towards the working majority and benefits the oligarchs, yet it’s pretty much impossible for an alternative party to get into power. The fact that you get to choose between two turds doesn’t make your system democratic. It’s an illusion of choice and it’s clearly enough to convince a lot of you that you have some sort of power.

          The way people get elected into your government is by having election campaigns, and these need a lot of funding. So the people the government actually answers to are the ones who pay for these campaign. That’s who gets represented in practice, and that’s why there is a continuous wealth transfer to the top that’s happening.

          What’s the process for the Chinese people?

          Voting, when a candidate doesn’t do what they got voted in to do then they get voted out. Having a single party or multiple parties is completely tangential to that. However, since Chinese system isn’t based around having huge campaign funds, it makes it possible for regular working class people to actually participate in politics.