From their Masto acct:

"It’s almost #DataPrivacyWeek - vote now for your favorite data privacy tools in this 1-minute survey! "

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    ISPs pass on your data to various authorities in quite a lot of countries. My own country (UK) has such a terrible privacy reputation I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find ISP’s hand over data for every request.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          God it feels good to have some of the only municipal fiber in the U.S… gigabit symetric for a flat $60/mo, never get ads from them, price is always the same, never gone down, speeds are largely as advertised… there’s even a 2.5 gig and 10 gig option. once i have the hardware for it I’m looking at the 2.5 gig. right now I’m almost saturating my 1 gig with jellyfin and stuff, but if I get some more hardware I’m looking at using it to properly get in on the self hosting scene finally.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Its a double edged sword. You don’t want the government to be the ISP but banning community broadband is silly. It should be perfectly legal and acceptable for a bunch if neighbors to get together and make there own network. It could function like a community garden.

          • admiralteal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Why is a private business inherently better than the government as an ISP, though?

            Either way it has to follow all relevant local laws about how to behave. The ISPs will respond to law enforcement requests either way. But at least a public entity will also need to be accountable to the public and respond to things like FOIA, as opposed to a private entity which has all kinds of ways to resist transparency and is more accountable to the shareholders.

            Either way it is a near natural monopoly because running redundant wires/fiber is a waste of resources. There won’t be much consumer choice.

            The idea that the government would be inherently inefficient is one that presumes a private entity that is highly insulated from market force wouldn’t. Free markets create a lot of pressure to improve products, but there’s no free market happening in a utility like an ISP. Even in the most competitive markets, that’s still choosing one from maybe 4 providers that barely compete with each other at all. And you have to sign longterm contracts with all kinds of complex pricing to “test” the competition, and testing it requires pretty advanced knowledge beyond most users – if you have no freedom to easily change your ISP, there’s just not any competition.

            If the sword is double-edged, one of those edges is safe enough for a renfair.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yep, same here. Its almost trivial for ISPs to hand over data to the govt on any invented basis. They also do so to any business or company that asks for it, but they will charge them fees AKA selling data.

      Worst part is there is no oversight, and there really is no segment of population that cares about privacy to raise this as an issue either.