• Hagdos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    You would have to find a good definition of “all browsers”, and I think that would be nearly impossible.

    I absolutely agree that governments should support Firefox, that’s a reasonable claim. But do they need to support the earliest version of netscape? Or the browser I made as a hobby project last week and published as open source? There’s a limit to what’s reasonable and workable.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Specific versions of basic standards would do. HTML forms, as another comment says. With tables and CSS which doesn’t make it unusable if your browser doesn’t support CSS.

    • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Conforms to a specific revision of HTML with a specific revision of JavaScript and css, also requiring it to not use any proprietary extensions of either HTML or JavaScript.

      Or the government could just use PDFs and email, I think that might be able to accomplish all the functionality of most websites.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      As the others have mentioned, it’s about following standards. Like if you specify a design for a plug using standard measurement units, people can then make plugs that plug into that using whatever measurement and calibration tools they want because they all generally follow standards.

      It would be like if the government released some device that was meant to be repaired by anyone but used some proprietary Apple screw head for all the screws. That’s not repairable by anyone, that’s only repairable by Apple customers.