I propose 2024 is the year of early access games boycott.

Bring back completed games only.

  • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s more like an investment in infrastructure. The city isn’t making a dime from repaving roads, but they certainly are useful. It’s a bit of a gamble if they’ll develop potholes or even get finnished sometimes, but people want roads.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And people stay productive by enjoying hobbies and playing games. It’s an investment in infrastructure, just like fire, healthcare, police, power, water, transportation, etc.

        Also, most roads in North America are cash negative, with many cities building new suburbs with high tax to pay for the roads in the previous suburb which are falling apart, which were built to pay for the next last suburb, on and on until the first car-centric suburbs were built in the 50s and 60s. Low density housing rarely pays for it’s public utilities directly, needing to essentially be subsidised by city centers to be worth it, and then you replace business with parking lots and everything gets so much worse…

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There are thousands of great game that wouldn’t have got off the ground without early access, so not participating could absolutely change the quality of the final product. In many ways, early access in one step removed from crowdsourcing, which is an investment in an idea.

            Investments aren’t necessarily about leveraging capital to generate more capital. It would be a very sad life to live where everything must be categorized by ROI.