• Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    Reminder that major news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox just buy their stories from news agencies like Associated Press and Reuters specifically so they can adjust the stories to their agenda. This is why they are news outlets, not news agencies.

    If you legitimately want news just being presented as-is, just go to the source and read it directly from the agency. I personally haven’t seen a slant when reading from either Reuters or AP.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Really, you’ve never detected slant from Reuters or AP?

      I agree that cnn, fox, etc are outlets and not agencies but calling the agencies unbiased is also wrong.

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        I only recently learned that knowledge, so I’ve only started doing this - hence the “personally, I haven’t seen” comment. But I probably just haven’t read enough of their articles to get a feel for their slants if they have any.

        So far though, I will say, both AP and Reuters are a hell of a lot more neutral and matter-of-fact in presenting news than any news outlet in recent years.

      • rxbudian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        What would be considered slant?
        a guide would be good here for defining slant so everyone can go through a checklist and say, yeah that article or news agency’s articles are slanted

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Literally everyone has a bias. That is all I’m saying. People like to pretend that some groups keep things “objective” but that’s not really possible or desirable, what is possible is being biased but staying factual.