More video and eyewitness info on Al Jazeera so far

Also reported on Common Dreams and Middle East Eye.

I haven’t found any reports of any independent investigations yet, hopefully they are underway

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    TL:DR: Israel isn’t defending itself by committing a genocide against a population they’ve subjugated.

    There are a series of issues with this…

    • Genocide isn’t an act of defence - it’s an attempt to completely exterminate a group of people, and is the greatest act of aggression a group could possibly commit.

    • The response we’re seeing is in no way proportionate, and causing a completely unacceptable level of civilian casualties (10k+ children alone in response to 1,200 total killed according to Israeli counts).

    • Israel have killed more Palestinians than the total number of Hamas members in existence with zero indication of progress, and no sign of stopping.

    • Israel have maintained Palestine in conditions described by the UN as an open air concentration camp, and have placed severe apartheid restrictions on Palestinians for years.

    • Israel have killed orders of magnitude more Palestinians than Hamas have killed Israelis.

    • Israel funded the rise of Hamas (who were no less violent then) over the secular moderates - as confirmed by both IDF leadership at the time she Arafat. I see no reason for them to do this other than to manufacture pretext for the genocide while maintaining US support.

    • Palestinians seem to have a lot more to “defend themselves” against - between the numbers killed and displaced and the very restrictive living conditions they’re subjected to.

    • Israeli leadership have said pretty plainly and repeatedly that they intend to exterminate Palestinians - if all Palestinians were to lay down arms and submit to the apartheid conditions, movement restrictions, and conditions we’ve seen over the past decade, the well funded nuclear power with modern military simply won’t stop.

    What makes Israel’s actions self-defence while Hamas’s lesser actions are not?

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m sure you’d call Hamas’s actions a genocide, but based on what definition or metric?

        No differences between Israel and the Nazis?

        No difference between Israel’s self-defence and Hamas’s attacks?

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Your inability to point to a meaningful distinction between those you’re supporting and literal Nazis or provide a consistent definition of genocide (because you can’t manufacture one that describes Hamas without admitting Israel is committing one) says far more than Godwin’s law ever will.

            • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your inability to form any argument besides a comparison to Nazis says far more about your reasons for advocating for genocide of Israelis.

              • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Still waiting on that definition of genocide or a meaningful distinction from the Nazis.

                Meanwhile, I don’t need to make an argument - I’ll just let the Israeli leadership do that for me…

                Prime Minister Netanyahu 

                They (Israel/IDF) are committed to completely eliminating this evil from the world,”

                and 

                You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember.

                and

                I don’t call them human animals because that would be insulting to animals

                “Defence” minister Galant

                We are fighting human animals, and we are acting accordingly

                Kallner…

                Nakba to the enemy now! This day is our Pearl Harbour. We will still learn the lessons. Right now, one goal: Nakba! A Nakba that will overshadow the Nakba of 48. A Nakba in Gaza and a Nakba for anyone who dares to join!

                Atbaryan… 

                erasing all of Gaza from the face of the Earth. Gaza needs to be wiped out.

                Halevi…

                goals for this victory. One, there is no more Muslim land in the land of Israel. After we make it the land of Israel, Gaza should be left as a monument, like Sodom.”

    • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      1. No legitimate person is accusing Israel of extermination. My impression is most of you are accusing Israel of “cultural genocide” and not actual extermination. Am I wrong on that?

      2. A disproprortionate response in war is not in the definition of genocide. Is your argument that Israel is committing war crimes or that they are specifically doing genocide, and are you aware that there is a legal difference?

      3. How do you define progress when fighting a terrorist cell? Are you using the same rubric that the IDF is or are you defining progress differently? This point feels like it weakens your argument.

      4. I would need to see the direct quote you reference. And seeing that Israel left Gaza in 2005, apartheid is a dishonest word to use in reference here. West Bank, sure, but I believe the argument made is that Israelis are genociding Gaza’s, not those currently in.the West Bank. If the rhetoric has changed, please inform me.

      5. Point 5 is just point 2 repeated. Please reference that.

      6. Hamas began as a human rights charity. Can you establish that Israel paid Hamas to attack Israel or is that conjecture? Are you also claiming that it’s the Israeli’s who support Hamas and not the Palestinian people? If so, doesn’t it make sense for the Palestinians to turn over the Israeli sleeper agents who govern them to the international courts as evidence of genocide? As we can see, this point, if what you are trying to make, is easily disproven by the fact that the Palestinians are not bringing down Hamas themselves.

      7. Having a lot to work against doesn’t make you the victim of genocide. This point brings nothing to your argumentt.

      8. Please provide the direct quotations, not reporting of the quotations. This point you might be correct on, but the ones I have seen were grossly mistranslated and the correct translations were clearly in reference to Hamas fighters, not all Palestinians.

      I didn’t write this to attack, but because I think your post deserved a response instead of possibly getting lost.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I disagree with point 2, or maybe it needs to be clarified?

        A disproportionate response is a war crime (not genocide) but deaths each side isn’t the measure of proportionality - neither is strength, tech, economic strength.

        Proportionality is using only as much force as necessary to eliminate the threat and minimize civilian casualties. I haven’t seen the intel reports of the attacks on civilian structures that hamas are using, but proportional response does need to be called into question.

        • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think everybody is willing to have a conversation on the imbalance of power and whether Israel can show more restraint.

          The people screaming genocide aren’t allowing us to have that conversation unless it is on their terms.