Came across this article, and it’s a very interesting take on how Star Trek has changed with the times, and how modern audiences seem to have a harder time trusting institutions or imagining Trek’s utopia.

  • Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Modern Trek (by which I mean SNW) is very very close to being good to me. Something about the dialogue just throws me off though, along with the hour long episodes not really suiting the subgenre imo.

    I think people are genuinely trying to make SNW good, just kind of a lightning in a bottle scenario

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, I wholly agree. I still think that the show is still firmly rooted in nostalgia not in making a new attempt to outline a future.

      • HWK_290@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Look, it’s Kirk’s brother’s roommate’s boyfriend from that one background scene in that one episode! . Modern star wars has the same problem of making an entire universe seem so small. Makes me appreciate the bold choice that was Voyager: tossing them far away from anything familiar and any cameos (not that we didn’t get them but they had to be more creative within the premise, aka tuvok on sulu’s Excelsior )

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, both are clear examples of the money people overfitting to a data set. They did a poll about what people like about star trek wars and made movies include that, the issue they assumed it meant put the exact same thing in the new movies.