nekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoSweden Closes Investigation of Pipeline Blasts, but Stays Silent on Causewww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1129
arrow-up1129external-linkSweden Closes Investigation of Pipeline Blasts, but Stays Silent on Causewww.nytimes.comnekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squaremihies@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up19·9 months agoThey wouldn’t give up the income from gas. Your theory doesn’t make sense. They would either raise prices, close pipeline or invent some other excuse. Note that Russia is still merrily selling gas to Europe.
minus-squareavater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agobut not on the scale it has before and germany for example is free of russian gas. They are bleeding money
minus-squaremihies@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 months agoBut that wouldn’t be because Russia wanted it. And I’m not sure that Germany is really free from Russian gas, it’s a mess, probably they are still getting some but at much higher cost. https://energyandcleanair.org/december-2023-monthly-analysis-on-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/
They wouldn’t give up the income from gas. Your theory doesn’t make sense. They would either raise prices, close pipeline or invent some other excuse. Note that Russia is still merrily selling gas to Europe.
but not on the scale it has before and germany for example is free of russian gas. They are bleeding money
But that wouldn’t be because Russia wanted it. And I’m not sure that Germany is really free from Russian gas, it’s a mess, probably they are still getting some but at much higher cost. https://energyandcleanair.org/december-2023-monthly-analysis-on-russian-fossil-fuel-exports-and-sanctions/