• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    it’s just that PoW is trash when applied at scale for encouraging energy use to create consensus - and that’s by design - so indeed, “there’s something wrong with the protocol”.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      you seem to understand that the protocol can function without the massive power use but you seem to want to blame the protocol for the power use.

      at this point, we have to agree to disagree.

      have a nice day

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        the protocol can function without the massive power use

        At scale no, it can’t and that’ll never be the case because at any given time, someone will be willing to put more energy (work) into it to gain an advantage - so as long as there’s demand for that coin, PoW will always demand huge amounts of energy.

        And yes, I do blame the consensus protocol because ultimately that’s the culprit of causing this incentive to waste energy and targeting miners or any other actors is an utter waste of time.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          > at any given time, someone will be willing to put more energy (work) into it to gain an advantage

          that’s not a problem with the protocol. that’s a problem with people. that’s like saying that houses are a problem because people rent them to exploit the working class. the problem isn’t the house, it’s the people who try to buy all the houses.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I never said there’s a problem with the protocol - that’s indeed, working as intended. There IS a problem of using the protocol (at scale) though, because it creates this unsustainable environment.

            As another comment put it: PoW is the coal burning of this era.

            Using it for your bbq is no big deal. Using it to generate energy for half the world is awful.

            • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              >There IS a problem of using the protocol (at scale) though, because it creates this
              unsustainable environment.

              this isn’t true. the protocol is still functioning fine. the problem is how people are using the protocol.

              • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                And there’s no way to use it so that it doesn’t consume huge amounts of energy because of greed and because of how computers work.

                So very much a problem of using PoW.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  you can certainly use it: using the protocol to transact doesn’t contribute meaningfully to power consumption. power consumption is almost entirely in the mining.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            meaning PoW is not such a problem when applied to create consensus in local or niche blockchains as the difficulty (and energy consumption) is orders of magnitude lower. For widely used coins it’s a terrible choice.