Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations | The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can’t make its operations work here.::The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can’t make its operations work here. All seven of its California stations will close immediately.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wait, so … They’re nowhere near useful when we can already use them for daily commuting easily because of some arbitrary goalpost for an unrelated transportation method? How does that even make sense?

    Infrastructure for hydrogen fueling requires production facilities, trucks to transport, and stations set up, to even start moving one vehicle let alone taking over any percentage of commuter traffic of any significance. EV fueling infrastructure requires… Pretty much the same grid we already have, at least as a functional baseline (yes, it needs improvements, but we’re not switching overnight so we have the time we need to make those changes; meanwhile, it’s already functional)

    • daqqad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It isn’t arbitrary. Just a simplified example of stored energy to weight ratio.

      Infra would show up if people didn’t jump on wrong tech just like electric charging infra is starting to show up.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s that subjective “wrong tech” again

        And again, the wholesale infrastructure needed is what I’m talking about, not the infrastructure availability.

        Again: hydrogen requires, at a minimum, production facilities, trucking to distribution nodes, and fueling stations to get the fuel to the consumer.

        Electricity… Is already being delivered. It just needs a way to plug in.

        This has precisely zero to do with which tech has been “jump[ed] on”.

        • daqqad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m talking about public infra, not charging at home since most people cannot charge at home. Almost the same amount of infra is required since current capacities are nowhere near sufficient. So it has everything to do with people jumping on wrong tech and money being wasted on useless infra.