Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think cosmetic surgery should be limited to adults, yes. Circumcision here is usually cosmetic (someone wants the baby to look like the Dad, I am not kidding, that is the argument I hear the most) so like labiaplasty, I don’t think it should be done to people who can’t choose it. I don’t think intersex babies should be modified either.

    Trans care for minors does not involve surgery. But other gender affirming care should be available to those over 13, like sexual health services are, without parental consent. That’s the age we legally think kids get some privacy rights so why not this?

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cosmetic surgery encompasses a lot more things than boob jobs. A burn victim getting skin replacement is cosmetic surgery for example.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure, that’s valid. A burn is an injury and repairing a skin injury is plastic surgery but I guess I didn’t think of it as cosmetic.

        Mostly I wanted to say that I do think gender care is something like sexual health services, that people we consider children for other purposes are granted the right to access this on their own. Right now in my state those kids can’t even get counseling or lab services related to transgender care.

    • Poik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are times where intersex babies need surgery to prevent complications. For anything else, let them wait until they can decide. Agreed 100%.