• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    a boring dystopia

    late stage capitalism

    Anyway poor people don’t buy Kellogg’s, it’s overpriced. Poor people buy the generic cereals that come in those huge plastic ziplock resealable bags. Not only do they cost less but they have more intelligent useful packaging and the quality is fine too.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of people here are missing the fact that cereal doesn’t require any additional cost, time, and/or effort to store and prepare (in a desperate situation you might even have it with water or dry if you can’t access milk).

    So while rice or potatoes might be a better meal, and the ingredients cheaper to buy (but not when you factor in cost and time of cooking), they may still not be an option for some.

    For those who have never really been it - it’d blow your mind how expensive it is to be poor in so many different ways (a feature of capitalism, of course, not a bug).

  • sness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Every time I’ve eaten cereal for dinner, it was never because it was cheap. I’ve always had cheaper and healthier alternatives. Cereal for dinner isn’t a poverty meal, it’s a poor mental health meal.

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t do this, you’ll be malnourished. Grains aren’t a particularly good food group.

    Potatoes don’t require much prep, are generally cheap and filling, and will be much better nutrient wise. I’d still recommend rice and beans though. Canned beans work if you have no means to cook.

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Beans are cheaper dry than canned though. If you have the patience you can start them in a slow cooker before you go to work.

      Garlic, onion, and peppers go miles in making beans taste good while also being cheaper.

      • Cornucopiaofplenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m wondering now though whether the cost balances out because dry beans require a lot more energy to cook? I know they need at least an hour on the stove, whereas canned beans you can just add to a chilli etc straight away

        • Tessellecta@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This can also be mitigated a lot by cooking the beans in the morning mor a short time, packing the pan into a lot of blankets and then cooking it shortly in the evening.