Is the NYT ever gonna publish an explanation of this mess, or do they get away with just having redacted the article to include “may”. Because “may” only ever meant “may or may not”.
I have been a subscriber for long, but that ends till they do a mea culpa.
Is the NYT ever gonna publish an explanation of this mess, or do they get away with just having redacted the article to include “may”. Because “may” only ever meant “may or may not”.
I have been a subscriber for long, but that ends till they do a mea culpa.
The damage has been done. Without a full retraction, there is no pulling it back.