• chicagohuman@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was being sarcastic, tbh. I’m happy to see this (I use Linux everywhere), but I’m realistic. 3% doesn’t look super impressive. I’m not sure where the line would be, though. 10%?

    • Lengsel@latte.isnot.coffee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would guess Linux desktop means nothing until it gets close to 15% for software developers to include a Linux version for new software releases, of any kind or type of software.

      I do PC gaming and I only use Windows on that one gaming computer, so I can play any and all games, and have the best graphics hardware performance.

      All of my other computers are only a mix of BSD and Linux, but for playing games I’m not willing to use anything other than Windows.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems to have grown enough that software like Zoom, MS Teams, Webex and Teamviewer all have versions available for the various linux OSs. If the market was so tiny no software developer would want to release these and handle bug reports, and fixes. It would just not viable. So there must be enough of a base that this is needed.

        • Lengsel@latte.isnot.coffee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I know there is a market, as tiny as it is. Imagine how much further along corporate software for Linux would be if there was a single format for installing all software in a default configuration for a fresh Linux install.

          I genuinelly don’t understand why Linus never develeped a universal installer like .dmg, .msi, .exe, for Linux.