Highlighting the recent report of users and admins being unable to delete images, and how Trust & Safety tooling is currently lacking.

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does them working on the project voluntairly, makes them be able to steal code from non-opensource projects, ignore licenses and do other shit like that? If the answer is no, why does working on the project voluntairly lets them break the law in other ways?

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      steal code from non-opensource projects, ignore licenses and do other shit like that

      That’s a lot of incorrect assumptions there.

      They didn’t steal any code. They didn’t ignore licenses either. In fact, the only reason they had a judgment ruled against them is because they were taking monetary donations. Which was interpreted as “profiting”.

      They reverse engineered a process without stealing anything. They didn’t even circumvent DRM, which is actually protected by law on the grounds of creating personal backups and data/software preservation.

      You’re either very ignorant on the subject or you just ate up Nintendo’s BS.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was talking hypothetically. Are they allowed to do that? If not, then they cannot be noncompliant with GDPR, simple as.

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Are they allowed to do that?

          Actually yes. The people that run afoul of the GDPR are the people who run the instance servers. The code writers are not the ones legally responsible.