The popular messaging app Signal is currently experiencing server issues as reported by multiple user on X (formerly Twitter) and multiple sites such as downdetector.com .

So far no statement from Signal themselves, and their status website https://status.signal.org reports “Signal is up and running”

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    ✗ Signal is experiencing technical difficulties. We are working hard to restore service as quickly as possible.

    Status page now.

  • uin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Seems like everything is back to normal, at least from what I can tell on my end and a lot of other users’ reports.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Facebook engineers got mad they went down and decided to ddos the internet so they wouldn’t look bad.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    They still have issues registering new users. There’s a recaptcha loop problem.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know… Usernames are paired with numbers, so they shouldn’t be all that exclusive and hence it shouldn’t trigger an avalanche of people rushing to get the username they desire.

      • Synapse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought the goal of the username was to also have the ability to use Signal without any phone number at all

        • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nope, you still need a phone number. You just don’t need to give the phone number out to contacts you want to talk with and can instead use the username.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They are paired and, I think, exclusive (albeit with random numbers attached at the end so maybe meh).

        Who knows… session seems interesting.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d prefer if my private messages wouldn’t be made public, thank you.

      Sure, they are end to end encrypted, but giving everyone access to them is still dangerous.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        A message would not be going to everyone it would exist on your homeserver and the homeserver of whoever your messaging. Second your private messages would not be public u said it yourself its called encryption if u dont trust the encryption no point using signal in the first place. Third even if it made everything public the only meta data would be that u received a mesaage from someone at time xyz (not who just someone) look at sealed sender for more info on this.