• filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think here the point is that the US government seems to be not bothered by Meta’s data collection which by the way has already been used by Cambridge Analytica to swing elections in favour of one of the opponents and most likely used on countless more occasions but it is now super worried about Tiktok.

      And what did they do against Meta? To the best of my knowledge nothing effective.

      If they do this they should apply the same measures against Meta and other companies but they don’t. Which is disturbing.

      Same with Gaza and Israel. Hamas kills around less than 1 K civilians (mind you a lot of the killed on that first day were military), it is utter tragedy. Israel kills 30+K people, starves the local population, destroys almost completely the infrastructure and their homes and it is business as usual. And every now and then they are scorned to please their voting base while weapon sales to Israel are continuing. Replace Israel with Russia/NK/China or any other country the US considers hostile and they will have them sanctioned to hell, but since it is Israel, nothing of this is happening.

      At least have the fucking decency not to have double standards, because the rest of the world isn’t blind or stupid.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        As I recall they got Zuckerberg on stand and did their best “rabble rablle rabble” at him, with a few decent questions mixed in, then nothing.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Good to hear! Love it when a megacorp gets the screws now and again, wish it happened more frequently (specifically to ISPs who took government funds for fiber infrastructure)

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, you have pointed out the subtext that was there all along and pretended like it’s some new argument.

        It is about the data sharing. The US doesn’t like companies sharing data with countries that it views as its geopolitical rivals. Big surprise, am I right?

        • MinorLaceration@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Seriously. Don’t cover your eyes and pretend you can’t see why the government treats US companies different than companies that are directly in the hands of adversaries. They might not care if Meta uses it to profit off of us, but they certainly do care if China will use it to achieve an advantage over us, militarily or otherwise.

      • fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can’t order Jimmy John’s on my work computer anymore. Why? Because tiktok is blocked on our work network. What does tiktok have to do with Jimmy John’s? Well I would have thought nothing expect it won’t let you set your delivery option unless it’s allowed to send data to analytics.tiktok.com.

        Why is a God damn sandwich shop sending my location to tiktok? No idea, but it’s definitely not just the video app that’s the problem.

      • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 months ago

        I dunno what hill you’re trying to die on here. A stupid dancing app that provides a data collection platform by a foreign surveillance state is a plot on the Orville. Nobody is concerned with it competing with Google, Apple orYouTube. It’s so off-base. Google sucks anyway. If people are searching on TikTok it’s because it’s giving better results for them than Google. It’s about who is collecting the data.

          • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            No, I think it sets a bad precedent. I don’t think TikTok should be allowed in the US (if the US decides it doesn’t want it as they’re seeming to). Taking the property is going to cause a bunch of what you mentioned.

          • pycorax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Isn’t this in some way the same as how China bans a number of foreign companies from operating? I don’t think doing the exact same thing is entirely fair but when others aren’t playing by the same rules, it’s a lot less black and white.