• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better SUSE than Oracle I guess so we will see how this works out. But in general it is good (and even in Red Hat’s interest) if more people invest into the development of a stable enterprise Linux release instead of leaching off Red Hat’s contributions.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This isnt good for Redhat. Its a hard fork that will be compatible with rhel, basically a new Centos, with SUSE marketing and branding all over it. Even the announcement mentions 5 other SUSE products for the enterprise while offering an alternative to rhel. This is a sales funnel away from Redhat enterprise products to SUSE enterprise products.

      This is good for linux, not for Redhat.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are missing the point. More contributions to Linux helps RHEL more than copy-cat re-builds that contribute nothing.

        • gobbling871@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          More contributions to Linux from parties other than RHEL don’t help RHEL. That’s literally the view they have taken since their announcement.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That is not what they said at all. They said pure bug-for-bug compatible rebuilds don’t help RHEL. Which is undeniably true.

            • gobbling871@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Just because they said that they don’t think RHEL clones contribute to the RHEL ecosystem doesn’t mean that it is entirely true. Are you new to PR speak?

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yet they consistently say that other contributions to Linux are very welcome and help RHEL, CentOS stream and everyone else. I think you have a strong case of selective memory and reading comprehension that only sees what fits into your pre-determined world-view 😜

                • gobbling871@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes. What they say and their actions are entirely contradictory in my own warped view.

                  But good thing am not the only one who seems to think so 🤪 as clearly Oracle and SUSE agree with this view.

                  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If one thing has always been true, it is that Oracle will always chose the wrong side of history no matter what.

                    Be careful who your allies are 😬

            • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think maybe to point out that SUSE is already the second largest enterprise Linux provider in the market. They already studied RHEL code, this would have been a gentleman’s agreement broken not to outright copy each other. RHEL will easily copy SLES improvements and incorporate it into their own code, but SUSE will gain marketshare.