the android device I might buy with the audio format I usually listen to.

Some of my flacs are way over 3 mbps (up to 6 mbps). The bluetooth on my desktop supports speeds up to 1 mbps. If the pixel is going to support similar rates, I don’t see how this is going work.

ETA: Im still going to nuke the device and install graphene or lineage on it. Do both foss support higher rates?

  • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    Bluetooth connection is lossy, with the exception of some Sony proprietary shitcodecs that can rarely actually maintain a stable enough connection to stay in lossless mode.

    Whether you’ll actually hear any difference is a different question, but the answer is maybe. The Bluetooth codecs are generally low quality, despite opus already existing and being on paper really good for the job (and implemented by pipewire but nothing else unfortunately). Bluetooth instead standardized some patent encumbered codecs with high licensing fees that are only about as good as or possibly worse than mp3. They also have very high latency and using them to watch videos of people talking sucks

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        LDAC suffers from high latency and very steep degradation once the strength of the Bluetooth connection drops even slightly. In some case it can drop to around 330kbps, which makes it no better than SBC unless you can guarantee a rock solid connection at all times.

      • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Its encoder is. A decoder requires royalty fees. Not too terrible tbh but a fully open codec is still preferrable.