• Dr_Satan@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Without a process for appeal and review we all know how that goes. We are not infants.

    • L3s@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just to be transparent, I’m the mod who removed your posts.

      We get a lot of rule breaking posts between the multiple communities I moderate, some of them get upvoted heavily and still get removed.

      For example, someone posted a scientific post that had nothing to do with technology in /c/Technology@lemmy.world, it had a decent amount of upvotes and comments. It was still removed for rule 2 of that community, as it was off topic for that community and there are ones that exists for that content.

      Sorry that it upset you, but if I could give you advise: just follow the community rules and you won’t have these issues

      • Dr_Satan@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But you avoided my point.

        Hundreds say yes. You say no. But your opinion wins. Is that immoral?

        • L3s@lemmy.world
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I didn’t avoid your point, I actually answered it: rules are rules and exist for a reason, if you break a communities rules they will remove your post or comment.

          To put it more simply for you, no, it is not immoral - especially when you look at the context of your question.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Usually the appeal is as simple as messaging the mod of a community. If it was an error, they will usually fix it pretty easily. The review is the mod log which is a public record of all moderation activity.