A painting of Lord Balfour housed at the University of Cambridge’s Trinity College was slashed by protest group Palestine Action.

The painting of Lord Balfour was made in 1914 by Philip Alexius de László inside Trinity College. The Palestine Action group specifically targeted the Lord Balfour painting, describing his declaration as the beginning of “ethnic cleansing of Palestine by promising the land away—which the British never had the right to do.”

    • superbirra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      or maybe they read it and think that nonetheless. I read the article and found this action shitty.

      • superbirra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        lol, the amount of downvotes for an opinion expressed says more than a thousand words about the state of this platform/community. Not that I give a shit, but still funny :D

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s always cute when someone gets so butthurt about meaningless internet points that they have to make a post to point out how “little” they care.

          • superbirra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I hope this comment helps you finally find friends to do things with, maybe not just on social networks. I for one continue to give a fuck, believe it or not lol :P

        • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I welcome the downvotes it means im doing a good job i get just as many downvotes here as i do on far right platforms. They want to dislike what i have to say let em they had the choice to engage in productive discause they didnt want to and expressed their hate. It truly does refelct upon them more than anything.

    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I did read the article and because he had a direct role in the destruction thats all the more reason not to deface it. Its a reason to hang it in a gallery with a little plaque explaining what he did then when people see that artwork and read the plaque they will understand maybe they didnt understand before maybe this is news to them maybe they are learning and forming a more informed opinion maybe it will inspire them to do something. Or we can deface it remove it hide it away and that discussion about what he did why he did it will be lost forever.

      • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was hanging in a gallery out of respect for him. Thanks to activists, you just learned what a shitty person he was. Mission accomplished.