• lledrtx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know what you are even arguing. My point is India is democratic and secular despite being flawed. Do you not agree with that? If you don’t agree with that, why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?

    Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

    My point is India is democratic and secular - and that’s an achievement in South Asia (that’s why compared to Pakistan). And that has made it more developed. So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

    If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?

      Yeah you are the type of people I was describing.

      If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?

      Never said anything about pakistan, but you are the type of guy to celebrate for getting a participation lol. Also what is this doomer logic. It doesn’t make any sense.

      Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

      Weren’t you describing how much better India is compared to these countries? These numbers are abnormally large and if you think pakistan and bangladesh are not densely populated, I have news for you.

      I’m ending the conversation here. There’s no point arguing with a nationalist that thinks his country has/can do no wrong.

      So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

      You are doing the opposite rn btw.