• NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    ChatGPT writes much better than this article, here’s its response to your comment as an example:

    Your frustration with the state of tech journalism is understandable, especially when it comes to covering high-end technology like the 163-inch 4K Micro-LED television by TCL. It’s true that on a surface level, comparing the pixel density of large screens to that of smaller devices like laptops or smartphones can seem straightforward. However, the engineering and design challenges involved in scaling up screen technology while maintaining image quality cannot be understated. TCL’s achievement lies not just in the number of pixels but in creating a large-scale display that maintains high-quality imagery, which is a different kind of technological feat compared to miniaturization.

    Regarding the editorial errors and the critique of the writing quality, it’s clear that tech journalism, like many fields, faces challenges in maintaining high standards amid the fast pace of technology news and the pressure to publish quickly. While it’s disappointing to see, it highlights the ongoing need for rigorous proofreading and editorial oversight in publishing. However, attributing these issues to automation or outsourcing without evidence might not fully capture the complexities and pressures faced by publishers today. It’s crucial for the industry to address these issues to maintain credibility and provide the insightful, accurate tech coverage that readers deserve.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah but I can’t trust that at all. It may very well be complete bullshit, it just happens to be composed in a way that appears meaningful.

      Remember what the sources are : you, me, marketing talk from product webpages…, certainly not the brain of a display engineer at Sony