UN Security Council passes resolution calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, as US shifts position by abstaining from vote

  • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    No. It means enough people screaming genocide Joe loudly enough had a small but tangible impact on American foreign policy.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No

      So you’re unironically arguing that geopolitical diplomacy IS actually simple? Really?

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That sentence isn’t relevant though is it?

          Do you think geopolitics is that simple or nah?

          • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Of course the sentence is relevant. I’m not sure why I should bother writing a reply to you when you apparently stop reading them after the first word. Have a good day.

            • gmtom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              JFC you aren’t even denying it. you guys actually unironically believe it’s that simple.

                • gmtom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It’s not selective reading. If I make a statement and you say “No” that mea s you’re refuting that statement.

                  Then their second sentence had nothing to do with wether they think these politics are simple or not, hence why I didn’t quit it.

                  The OP is just using bad faith arguments to distracts from that. Which is why they don’t even attempt to deny it and just criticise the fact I didn’t quote their entire comment instead of responding.

                  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    No, you didn’t read it properly, and I’d say you’re arguing in bad faith or you just cannot read properly as everyone else seems to have done just fine. Ignoring so much of their comment then their intention afterwards makes you look silly. You are wrong, your understanding is wrong.

      • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Certainly not, but he definitely cares about the 100,000 people that voted uncommitted in Michigan and the littany of polls that show a majority of Democratic and young voters not supporting current US foreign policy.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The uncommitted movement got 100K votes Michigan, and within days the Biden administration started a complete 180 on Israel. It’s more than a few Twitter users and he clearly cares very deeply.