• janAkali@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      From interview: it started as a research project. The author wanted a distribution that uses the least system resources with maximum performance.
      He started with archlinux, moved on to gentoo and to go even deeper - found the infamous “linux from scratch” and started to shape his own distro.

        • janAkali@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Half of the linux ecosystem is personal projects.
          Linux itself started as

          just a hobby, won’t be big and professional like gnu

          It’s not useless as you can learn from it.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            The reason Linux is such a big deal is that it was the one of dozens that didn’t fail. This is ignorable.

            “People laughed at Einstein, they also laughed at bozo the clown.”

            • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              By your logic, you cannot dismiss the project for being a personal one. Only if it fails, is it dismissable.

              • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I can do whatever I want. And odds are very good this is a fly-by-night personal project that goes nowhere.

                • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Didn’t say you can’t whatever you want. I said “by your logic”. That was assuming you don’t contradict your own logic, but of course you can otherwise :)

                  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Okay - so here’s the thing. You want to play stupid word games you can play stupid word games. There’s a 99% chance I never hear of this stupid project again. It has nothing interesting going for it and is supported by exactly one developer.

                    Sure - lightning may strike twice and this becomes the next “big thing”. But the chance is so remote as to be zero. So yes - it’s a personal project that you can ignore.